A Manifesto for Patchwork Ethnography
Günel, G., Varma, S., & Watanabe, C. (2020). A manifesto for patchwork ethnography. Society for Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography
(function (window, document, $) { $(document).ready(function() { $('form select').each(function (i, e) { var label = $(e).parent().parent().find('.form-item-label').text().trim(); $(e).attr('aria-label', label); }); $('section.about-policy #related-information').attr('id', 'related-information-wrapper'); $('a:empty').remove() $('a span:empty').remove(); $('a').attr('aria-label', 'icon'); }); })(window, window.document, jQuery);
Günel, G., Varma, S., & Watanabe, C. (2020). A manifesto for patchwork ethnography. Society for Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography
Turner, D. (2021). Managing qualitative coding systems. Quirkos. https://www.quirkos.com/blog/post/managing-qualitative-coding-systems/
Hagen, J. (2021). On the fieldwork we choose NOT to do. jamiejhagen.com. https://www.jamiejhagen.com/post/on-the-fieldwork-we-choose-not-to-do
Irgil, E., Kreft, A., Lee, M., Willis, C., & Zvobgo, K. (2021). Field research: A graduate student’s guide. International Studies Review, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab023
Archive Title: HathiTrust Digital Library Link to Archive or Database: https://www.hathitrust.org/ About: Founded in 2008, HathiTrust is a not-for-profit collaborative of academic and research libraries preserving 17+ million digitized items. HathiTrust offers reading access to the fullest extent allowable by U.S. copyright law, computational access to the entire corpus for Read more…
Jackson, John L. (2004). An ethnographic filmflam: Giving gifts, doing research, and videotaping the native subject/object. American Anthropologist 106(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.1.32
UN Global Pulse. (2017). Understanding movement and perceptions of migrants and refugees with social media. Project Series 28. https://www.unglobalpulse.org/document/understanding-perceptions-of-migrants-and-refugees-in-europe-with-social-media/
Giglietto, F., & Lee, Y. (2017). A hashtag worth a thousand words: Discursive strategies around #JeNeSuisPasCharlie after the 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116686992
Awan, I. (2017). Cyber-extremism: Isis and the power of social media. Society 54, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-017-0114-0
Asmolov, G. (2018). The disconnecting power of disinformation campaigns. Journal of International Affairs 17(5), 69-76. https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/disconnective-power-disinformation-campaigns
Kozinets, R., Dolbec, P. & Earley, A. (2014). Netnographic analysis: understanding culture through social media data. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (262-276). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243
Giglietto, F., Rossi, L., & Bennato, D. (2012). The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as a research data source. Journal of Technology in Human Services 30(3-4), 145-159, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.743797
Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Hidson, E. (2019). The value of internet video calling and desktop sharing (VCDS) as a research method. In BERA 2019, 10-12 September 2019, Manchester, UK. https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/11303/
Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method (Rev. and expanded ed). University of New Mexico Press. https://unmpress.com/books/visual-anthropology/9780826308993
Muenchow, J., Schäfer, S., & Krüger, E. (2019). Reviewing qualitative GIS research—Toward a wider usage of open-source GIS and reproducible research practices. Geography Compass, 13(6), e12441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12441
Martin, M & Schuurman, N. (2020). Social media Big Data acquisition and analysis for qualitative GIScience: Challenges and opportunities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(5), 1335-1352, https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1696664
Volpe, C. (2019). Digital diaries: new uses of PhotoVoice in participatory research with young people. Children’s Geographies, 17:3, 361-370, https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1543852
Krieg, L. J., Berning, M., & Hardon, A. (2017). Anthropology with algorithms?. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.17157/mat.4.3.458
Stewart, B. (2016). Twitter as method: Using Twitter as a tool to conduct research. In The SAGE Handbook of social media research methods (pp. 251-265). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781473983847
Mendes K. & Ringrose J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: #MeToo and the everyday experiences of challenging rape culture. In Fileborn B. & Loney-Howes R. (eds) #MeToo and the Politics of Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_3
Middha, B. (2018). Everyday digital engagements: Using food selfies on Facebook to explore eating practices. Communication Research and Practice, 4(3), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1476796
Brown, N. (2018). Video-conference interviews: Ethical and methodological concerns in the context of health research. In SAGE Research Methods Cases. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781526441812
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (Third edition). Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/interviews/book239402#contents
Sumiala, J. & Tikka, M. (2011). Imagining globalised fears: School shooting videos and circulation of violence on YouTube. Social Anthropology 19, 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00158.x