Avatar watching: Participant observation in graphical online environments
Williams, M. (2007). Avatar watching: Participant observation in graphical online environments. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107071408
(function (window, document, $) { $(document).ready(function() { $('form select').each(function (i, e) { var label = $(e).parent().parent().find('.form-item-label').text().trim(); $(e).attr('aria-label', label); }); $('section.about-policy #related-information').attr('id', 'related-information-wrapper'); $('a:empty').remove() $('a span:empty').remove(); $('a').attr('aria-label', 'icon'); }); })(window, window.document, jQuery);
Williams, M. (2007). Avatar watching: Participant observation in graphical online environments. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107071408
Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056916
Seymour, W. S. (2001). In the flesh or online? Exploring qualitative research methodologies. Qualitative Research, 1(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100203
Schiek, D., & Ullrich, C. G. (2017). Using asynchronous written online communications for qualitative inquiries: A research note. Qualitative Research, 17(5), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117690216
Paechter, C. (2013). Researching sensitive issues online: Implications of a hybrid insider/outsider position in a retrospective ethnographic study. Qualitative Research, 13(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446107
Opara, V., Spangsdorf, S., & Ryan, M. K. (2021). Reflecting on the use of Google Docs for online interviews: Innovation in qualitative data collection. Qualitative Research, 14687941211045192. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211045192
Numerato, D. (2016). Behind the digital curtain: Ethnography, football fan activism and social change. Qualitative Research, 16(5), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115611207
Marland, A., & Esselment, A. L. (2019). Negotiating with gatekeepers to get interviews with politicians: Qualitative research recruitment in a digital media environment. Qualitative Research, 19(6), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118803022
Kaufmann, M., & Tzanetakis, M. (2020). Doing Internet research with hard-to-reach communities: Methodological reflections on gaining meaningful access. Qualitative Research, 20(6), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120904898
James, N., & Busher, H. (2006). Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065010
Hughes, K., Frank, V. A., Herold, M. D., & Houborg, E. (2021). Data reuse across international contexts? Reflections on new methods for International Qualitative Secondary Analysis. Qualitative Research, 14687941211052278. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211052278
Hookway, N. (2008). `Entering the blogosphere’: Some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085298
Hanna, E. (2019). The emotional labour of researching sensitive topics online: Considerations and implications. Qualitative Research, 19(5), 524–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118781735
Gatson, S. N., & Zweerink, A. (2004). Ethnography online: ‘Natives’ practising and inscribing community. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044431
Ferguson, R.-H. (2017). Offline ‘stranger’ and online lurker: Methods for an ethnography of illicit transactions on the darknet. Qualitative Research, 17(6), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117718894
Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126
Colom, A. (2021). Using WhatsApp for focus group discussions: Ecological validity, inclusion and deliberation. Qualitative Research, 1468794120986074. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120986074
Brooker, P., Dutton, W., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2017). What would Wittgenstein say about social media? Qualitative Research, 17(6), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117713058
Briassoulis, H. (2010). Online petitions: New tools of secondary analysis? Qualitative Research, 10(6), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110380530
Beneito-Montagut, R., Begueria, A., & Cassián, N. (2017). Doing digital team ethnography: Being there together and digital social data. Qualitative Research, 17(6), 664–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117724500
Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centered methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413368
Barratt, M. J., & Maddox, A. (2016). Active engagement with stigmatised communities through digital ethnography. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116648766
Mwambari, D., Purdeková, A., & Bisoka, A. N. (2021). Covid-19 and research in conflict-affected contexts: Distanced methods and the digitalisation of suffering. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794121999014
Jewitt, C., Price, S., & Xambo Sedo, A. (2017). Conceptualising and researching the body in digital contexts: Towards new methodological conversations across the arts and social sciences. Qualitative Research, 17(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116656036
Cardoza, D., Watanabe, C., Günel, G., & Varma, S. (2021). Interview: Patchwork ethnography. Society for Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/interview-patchwork-ethnography