Forrestal, S.G., D’Angelo, A.V., & Vogel, L.K.. (2015). Considerations for and lessons learned from online, synchronous focus groups. Survey Practice 8 (3). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2015-0015
Flynn, R., Albrecht, L., & Scott, S. D. (2018). Two approaches to focus group data collection for qualitative health research: Maximizing resources and data quality. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917750781
Reisner, S. L., Randazzo, R. K., White Hughto, J. M., Peitzmeier, S., DuBois, L. Z., Pardee, D. J., Marrow, E., McLean, S., & Potter, J. (2018). Sensitive health topics with underserved patient populations: Methodological considerations for online focus group discussions. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1658–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317705355
Postill, J. & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114
Lindgren, T., Fors, V., Pink, S., & Bergquist, M. (2019). Experiencing the future car: Anticipatory UX as a social and digital phenomenon. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 31(1), Article 1. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol31/iss1/1
Ferguson, R. (2009). The construction of shared knowledge through asynchronous dialogue. PhD thesis. The Open University. https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.00004dc4
Pink, S., Sumartojo, S., Lupton, D., & Heyes LaBond, C. (2017). Empathetic technologies: Digital materiality and video ethnography. Visual Studies, 32(4), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2017.1396192
Pink S. (2015). Going forward through the world: Thinking theoretically about first person perspective digital ethnography. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9292-0
Krause, P., Szekely, O., Bloom, M., Christia, F., Daly, S. Z., Lawson, C., Marks, Z., Milliff, A., Miura, K., Nielsen, R., Reno, W., Souleimanov, E.A., & Zakayo, A. (2021). COVID-19 and fieldwork: Challenges and solutions. Political Science & Politics, 1–6. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520001754
Burns, E. (2010). Developing email interview practices in qualitative research. Sociological Research Online, 15(4), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2232
Bampton, R., Cowton, C., & Downs, Y. (2013). The e-interview in qualitative research. In N. Sappleton (ed.), Advancing Research Methods with New Technologies, 329-343. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-3918-8.ch019
Fors V., Berg M., & Pink S. (2016) Capturing the ordinary: Imagining the user in designing automatic photographic lifelogging technologies. In Selke S. (ed.) Lifelogging. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13137-1_6
Barratt, M. J., & Maddox, A. (2016). Active engagement with stigmatised communities through digital ethnography. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116648766
Janghorban, R., Roudsari, R.L., & Taghipour, A.. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152
Howlett, M. (2021). Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691
Irvine, A. (2011). Duration, dominance and depth in telephone and face-to-face interviews: A comparative exploration. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000302
Hinchcliffe, V. & Gavin, H. (2009). Social and virtual networks: Evaluating synchronous online interviewing using instant messenger. The Qualitative Report 14(2), 318-340. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2009.1386
Kaur, H., Saukko, P., & Lumsden, K. (2018). Rhythms of moving in and between digital media: A study on video diaries of young people with physical disabilities. Mobilities, 13(3), 397-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1355349
Scerri, E.M.L., Kühnert, D., Blinkhorn, J., Groucutt, H.S., Roberts, P., Nicoll, K., Zerboni, A., Orijemie, E.A., Barton, H., Candy, I., Goldstein, S.T., Hawks, J., Niang, K., N’Dah, D., Petraglia, M.D., & Vella, N.C. (2020). Field-based sciences must transform in response to COVID-19. Nature Ecology Evolotuion 4, 1571–1574. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01317-8
Leemann, A., Jeszenszky, P., Steiner, C., Studerus, M., & Messerli, J. (2020). Linguistic fieldwork in a pandemic: Supervised data collection combining smartphone recordings and videoconferencing. Linguistics Vanguard, 6(s3). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0061
Esarey, J., and Wood, A.R. (2018). Blogs, online seminars, and social media as tools of scholarship in political science. Political Science & Politics 51 (4), 811–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000070
Murthy, D. (2011). Emergent digital ethnographic methods for social research. In Sharlene Hesse-Biber, (ed.) Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research, 158-179. New York: Oxford University Press. https://www.dhirajmurthy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Emergent-digital-ethnographic-methods-for-social-research_Murthy3.pdf
Cook, N. (2009). It’s good to talk: Performing and recording the telephone interview. Area, 41, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00851.x
Muntanyola Saura, D. & Romero Balsas, P. (2014). Interviewing and surveying over the phone: A reflexive account of a research on parenting. Quality & Quantity 48, 2615–2630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9911-8
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596