Conducting an Online Focus Group
Stancanelli, J. (2010). Conducting an online focus group. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 761–765. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol15/iss3/20/
(function (window, document, $) { $(document).ready(function() { $('form select').each(function (i, e) { var label = $(e).parent().parent().find('.form-item-label').text().trim(); $(e).attr('aria-label', label); }); $('section.about-policy #related-information').attr('id', 'related-information-wrapper'); $('a:empty').remove() $('a span:empty').remove(); $('a').attr('aria-label', 'icon'); }); })(window, window.document, jQuery);
Stancanelli, J. (2010). Conducting an online focus group. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 761–765. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol15/iss3/20/
Deggs, D., Grover, K., & Kacirek, K. (2010). Using message boards to conduct online focus groups. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 1027–1036. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292495847_Using_message_boards_to_conduct_online_focus_groups
Daniels, N., Gillen, P., Casson, K., & Wilson, I. (2019). STEER: Factors to consider when designing online focus groups using audiovisual technology in health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919885786
Boateng, B., Nelson, M., Huett, A., Meaux, J., Pye, S., Schmid, B., Berg, A., Laporte, K., Riley, L., & Green, A.. (2016). Online focus groups with parents and adolescents with heart transplants: Challenges and opportunities. Pediatric Nursing, 42(3), 120–154. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1807878180/
Barchard, K., & Williams, J. (2008). Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1111–1128. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1111
Jones, R. (1994). The ethics of research in cyberspace. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications And Policy, 4(3), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662249410798894
Hoser, B., & Nitschke, T. (2010). Questions on ethics for research in the virtually connected world. Social Networks, 32(3), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.11.003
Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320510186.
Capurro, R., & Pingel, C. (2002). Ethical issues of online communication research. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021372527024
Tunçalp, D. & Lê, P. (2014). (Re)Locating boundaries: a systematic review of online ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-11-2012-0048
Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837-855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094565
Markham, A. N. (2013). Fieldwork in social media: What would Malinowski do? Qualitative Communication Research, 2(4), 434-446. https://doi.org/10.1525/qcr.2013.2.4.434
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857020277
Hallett, R. E., & Barber, K. (2014). Ethnographic research in a cyber era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 306–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613497749
Garcia, A., Standlee, A., Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38, 52-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891241607310839
Dicks, B., Coffey, A., Mason, B. & Atkinson, P. (2005). Qualitative research and hypermedia ethnography for the digital age. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-and-hypermedia/book208000
Purcell, A. (2012). Academic archives: Managing the next generation of college and university archives, records, and special collections. Chicago: Neal-Schuman. https://www.alastore.ala.org/content/academic-archives-managing-next-generation-college-and-university-archives-records-and
Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods 21, 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08329699
Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to digital media. Annual review of anthropology, 39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945
Rogers, R. (2009). End of the virtual: Digital methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Ochoa, C., & Porcar, J. M. (2018). Modeling the effect of quota sampling on online fieldwork efficiency: An analysis of the connection between uncertainty and sample usage. International Journal of Market Research, 60(5), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318779545
Markham, A. N., & Baym, N. K. (Eds.). (2008). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483329086.n7
Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. London: Sage Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849209281
Hughes, J. (2012). SAGE Internet Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268513
Hoser, B., & Nitschke, T. (2010). Questions on ethics for research in the virtually connected world. Social Networks, 32(3), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.11.003