Online petitions: New tools of secondary analysis?
Briassoulis, H. (2010). Online petitions: New tools of secondary analysis? Qualitative Research, 10(6), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110380530
(function (window, document, $) { $(document).ready(function() { $('form select').each(function (i, e) { var label = $(e).parent().parent().find('.form-item-label').text().trim(); $(e).attr('aria-label', label); }); $('section.about-policy #related-information').attr('id', 'related-information-wrapper'); $('a:empty').remove() $('a span:empty').remove(); $('a').attr('aria-label', 'icon'); }); })(window, window.document, jQuery);
Briassoulis, H. (2010). Online petitions: New tools of secondary analysis? Qualitative Research, 10(6), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110380530
Beneito-Montagut, R., Begueria, A., & Cassián, N. (2017). Doing digital team ethnography: Being there together and digital social data. Qualitative Research, 17(6), 664–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117724500
Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centered methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413368
Barratt, M. J., & Maddox, A. (2016). Active engagement with stigmatised communities through digital ethnography. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116648766
Marzi, S. (2021). Participatory video from a distance: Co-producing knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic using smartphones. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211038171
Jewitt, C., Price, S., & Xambo Sedo, A. (2017). Conceptualising and researching the body in digital contexts: Towards new methodological conversations across the arts and social sciences. Qualitative Research, 17(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116656036
Egid, B., Ozano, K., Hegel, G., Zimmerman, E., López, Y., Roura, M., Sheikhattari, P., Jones, L., Dias, S., & Wallerstein, N.(2021). Can everyone hear me? Reflections on the use of global online workshops for promoting inclusive knowledge generation. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F14687941211019585
Kim, J., Williams, S., Eldridge, E., & Reinke, A. (2021). Digitally shaped ethnographic relationships during a global pandemic and beyond. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F14687941211052275
Distelhorst, G. & Fu, D. (2019). Performing authoritarian citizenship: Public transcripts in China. Perspectives on Politics 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718004024
Irgil, E., Kreft, A., Lee, M., Willis, C., & Zvobgo, K. (2021). Field research: A graduate student’s guide. International Studies Review, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab023
Rufas, A., & Hine, C. (2018). Everyday connections between online and offline: Imagining others and constructing community through local online initiatives. New Media & Society 20(10), 3879–3897. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818762364
Jackson, John L. (2004). An ethnographic filmflam: Giving gifts, doing research, and videotaping the native subject/object. American Anthropologist 106(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2004.106.1.32
Usherwood, S., & Wright, K. A. (2017). Sticks and stones: Comparing Twitter campaigning strategies in the European Union referendum. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117700659
Badawy, A. & Ferrara, E. (2018). The rise of Jihadist propaganda on social networks. Journal of Computational Social Science 1, 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-018-0015-z
Dutceac Segesten, A., & Bossetta, M. (2019). The Eurosceptic Europeanization of public spheres: Print and social media reactions to the 2014 European Parliament elections. Comparative European Politics, 17, 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-017-0099-5
Meek, D. (2012). Youtube and social movements: A phenomenological analysis of participation, events and cyberplace. Antipode 44(4), 1429–1448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00942.x
Kreis, R. (2017). #refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-refugee discourse on Twitter. Discourse & Communication, 11(5), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317714121
Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Muenchow, J., Schäfer, S., & Krüger, E. (2019). Reviewing qualitative GIS research—Toward a wider usage of open-source GIS and reproducible research practices. Geography Compass, 13(6), e12441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12441
Buckle, C. (2020). Touching, scrolling and swooping: Performing and representing migrant stories through geospatial technologies. Geoforum, 111, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.03.004
Martin, M & Schuurman, N. (2020). Social media Big Data acquisition and analysis for qualitative GIScience: Challenges and opportunities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(5), 1335-1352, https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1696664
Volpe, C. (2019). Digital diaries: new uses of PhotoVoice in participatory research with young people. Children’s Geographies, 17:3, 361-370, https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1543852
Krieg, L. J., Berning, M., & Hardon, A. (2017). Anthropology with algorithms?. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.17157/mat.4.3.458
Middha, B. (2018). Everyday digital engagements: Using food selfies on Facebook to explore eating practices. Communication Research and Practice, 4(3), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1476796
Brown, N. (2018). Video-conference interviews: Ethical and methodological concerns in the context of health research. In SAGE Research Methods Cases. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781526441812