Post, A. E., Agnihotri, A., & Hyun, C. (2018). Using crowd-sourced data to study public services: Lessons from urban India. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53, 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9271-4
Hanna, E. (2019). The emotional labour of researching sensitive topics online: Considerations and implications. Qualitative Research, 19(5), 524–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118781735
Brooker, P., Dutton, W., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2017). What would Wittgenstein say about social media? Qualitative Research, 17(6), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117713058
Willis, R., Yuille, A., Bryant, P., McLaren, D., & Markusson, N. (2021). Taking deliberative research online: Lessons from four case studies. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211063483
Mwambari, D., Purdeková, A., & Bisoka, A. N. (2021). Covid-19 and research in conflict-affected contexts: Distanced methods and the digitalisation of suffering. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794121999014
Event Title: Interpretivist Methods Clinic Event Description: “The Interpretivist Methods Clinic is evolving! Please join us for the October 26th meeting as we develop community goals for the next iteration of the virtual community.” Event Date: October 26, 2021 Sponsoring Organization: WPSA Virtual Communities Link: October 26th is the first Read more…
Distelhorst, G. & Fu, D. (2019). Performing authoritarian citizenship: Public transcripts in China. Perspectives on Politics 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718004024
Event Title: Tools of the Trade Event Description: “Tools of the Trade is a lunchtime series on the last Friday of the month, by Researchers for Researchers, in collaboration with ACENET. The idea is to share knowledge and make connections with and between researchers in Atlantic Canada, who are interested Read more…
Event Title: APSA 2021 Methods Café Event Description: “The 2021 APSA theme, “Promoting Pluralism,” encourages political scientists to embrace methodological pluralism in their study of political, economic, and social upheavals and significant transformations that are occurring across the globe. Given the emphasis of methodological diversity, our proposed Methods Café brings Read more…
Turner, D. (2021). Managing qualitative coding systems. Quirkos. https://www.quirkos.com/blog/post/managing-qualitative-coding-systems/
Hagen, J. (2021). On the fieldwork we choose NOT to do. jamiejhagen.com. https://www.jamiejhagen.com/post/on-the-fieldwork-we-choose-not-to-do
Irgil, E., Kreft, A., Lee, M., Willis, C., & Zvobgo, K. (2021). Field research: A graduate student’s guide. International Studies Review, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab023
Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Laurier, E. (2016). YouTube: fragments of a video‐tropic atlas. Area, 48: 488-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12157
Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. Polity. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Digital+Sociology:+The+Reinvention+of+Social+Research-p-9780745684789
Martin, B. & Hanington, B. (2018). The pocket universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas and design effective solutions. http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=1050618
Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Bristol: Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t88xn4
Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. & Mcmurray, J. (2018). The impact of the new EU GDPR on ethics governance and social anthropolgy. Anthropology Today. 34. 22-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12462
Sugie, N. F. (2018). Utilizing smartphones to study disadvantaged and hard-to-reach groups. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(3), 458–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115626176
Boase, J., & Humphreys, L. (2018). Mobile methods: Explorations, innovations, and reflections. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918764215
Krause, P., Szekely, O., Bloom, M., Christia, F., Daly, S. Z., Lawson, C., Marks, Z., Milliff, A., Miura, K., Nielsen, R., Reno, W., Souleimanov, E.A., & Zakayo, A. (2021). COVID-19 and fieldwork: Challenges and solutions. Political Science & Politics, 1–6. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520001754
Scerri, E.M.L., Kühnert, D., Blinkhorn, J., Groucutt, H.S., Roberts, P., Nicoll, K., Zerboni, A., Orijemie, E.A., Barton, H., Candy, I., Goldstein, S.T., Hawks, J., Niang, K., N’Dah, D., Petraglia, M.D., & Vella, N.C. (2020). Field-based sciences must transform in response to COVID-19. Nature Ecology Evolotuion 4, 1571–1574. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01317-8
Jones, R. (1994). The ethics of research in cyberspace. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications And Policy, 4(3), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662249410798894
Hoser, B., & Nitschke, T. (2010). Questions on ethics for research in the virtually connected world. Social Networks, 32(3), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.11.003
Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320510186.